counter create hit Comparing Financial Systems - Download Free eBook
Ads Banner
Hot Best Seller

Comparing Financial Systems

Availability: Ready to download

The authors argue that the view that market-based systems are best is simplistic; a more nuanced approach is necessary.Financial systems are crucial to the allocation of resources in a modern economy. They channel household savings to the corporate sector and allocate investment funds among firms; they allow intertemporal smoothing of consumption by households and expendit The authors argue that the view that market-based systems are best is simplistic; a more nuanced approach is necessary.Financial systems are crucial to the allocation of resources in a modern economy. They channel household savings to the corporate sector and allocate investment funds among firms; they allow intertemporal smoothing of consumption by households and expenditures by firms; and they enable households and firms to share risks. These functions are common to the financial systems of most developed economies. Yet the form of these financial systems varies widely. In the United States and the United Kingdom competitive markets dominate the financial landscape, whereas in France, Germany, and Japan banks have traditionally played the most important role. Why do different countries have such different financial systems? Is one system better than all the others? Do different systems merely represent alternative ways of satisfying similar needs? Is the current trend toward market-based systems desirable? Franklin Allen and Douglas Gale argue that the view that market-based systems are best is simplistic. A more nuanced approach is necessary. For example, financial markets may be bad for risk sharing; competition in banking may be inefficient; financial crises can be good as well as bad; and separation of ownership and control can be optimal. Financial institutions are not simply veils, disguising the allocation mechanism without affecting it, but are crucial to overcoming market imperfections. An optimal financial system relies on both financial markets and financial intermediaries.


Compare
Ads Banner

The authors argue that the view that market-based systems are best is simplistic; a more nuanced approach is necessary.Financial systems are crucial to the allocation of resources in a modern economy. They channel household savings to the corporate sector and allocate investment funds among firms; they allow intertemporal smoothing of consumption by households and expendit The authors argue that the view that market-based systems are best is simplistic; a more nuanced approach is necessary.Financial systems are crucial to the allocation of resources in a modern economy. They channel household savings to the corporate sector and allocate investment funds among firms; they allow intertemporal smoothing of consumption by households and expenditures by firms; and they enable households and firms to share risks. These functions are common to the financial systems of most developed economies. Yet the form of these financial systems varies widely. In the United States and the United Kingdom competitive markets dominate the financial landscape, whereas in France, Germany, and Japan banks have traditionally played the most important role. Why do different countries have such different financial systems? Is one system better than all the others? Do different systems merely represent alternative ways of satisfying similar needs? Is the current trend toward market-based systems desirable? Franklin Allen and Douglas Gale argue that the view that market-based systems are best is simplistic. A more nuanced approach is necessary. For example, financial markets may be bad for risk sharing; competition in banking may be inefficient; financial crises can be good as well as bad; and separation of ownership and control can be optimal. Financial institutions are not simply veils, disguising the allocation mechanism without affecting it, but are crucial to overcoming market imperfections. An optimal financial system relies on both financial markets and financial intermediaries.

31 review for Comparing Financial Systems

  1. 5 out of 5

    Rohan Mehta

    few chapters for my finance class

  2. 4 out of 5

    Soroosh Shahrivar

  3. 5 out of 5

    Harleen

  4. 4 out of 5

    Christopher Grant

  5. 4 out of 5

    Tarecq

  6. 4 out of 5

    Richard Marney

  7. 5 out of 5

    Faizan A

  8. 4 out of 5

    Pavel Krajicek

  9. 5 out of 5

    Castellanza

  10. 4 out of 5

    Toryn Green

  11. 5 out of 5

    James Chapman

  12. 5 out of 5

    Salomon Lobo

  13. 5 out of 5

    Stephanie

  14. 4 out of 5

    Matt Cheung

  15. 4 out of 5

    Steph Bell

  16. 5 out of 5

    Jamal

  17. 5 out of 5

    Neelsavla

  18. 4 out of 5

    Mohamad

  19. 4 out of 5

    Torab

  20. 5 out of 5

    Prazi

  21. 5 out of 5

    Richie

  22. 4 out of 5

    Joe

  23. 5 out of 5

    Cordu

  24. 5 out of 5

    jiajing zhu

  25. 4 out of 5

    Alex Marini

  26. 4 out of 5

    Cherno

  27. 4 out of 5

    Maria Sportillo

  28. 5 out of 5

    Shashwat Gautam

  29. 4 out of 5

    Sasha Perelygin

  30. 4 out of 5

    John Stone

  31. 4 out of 5

    Alicia Garcia Herrero

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.