counter create hit George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography - Download Free eBook
Ads Banner
Hot Best Seller

George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography

Availability: Ready to download

An expose of the Bush family. Documented by search of dozens of archives and months of interviews with government insiders, this biography digs up all the dirt - frightening, gory, hilarious - on the Bush dynasty.


Compare
Ads Banner

An expose of the Bush family. Documented by search of dozens of archives and months of interviews with government insiders, this biography digs up all the dirt - frightening, gory, hilarious - on the Bush dynasty.

30 review for George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography

  1. 4 out of 5

    Cwn_annwn_13

    Unlike other books about the Bush crime family I have read, even those that had an obvious anti-Bush bias going in, Tarpley leaves no stone uncovered in digging into the life of Poppy Bush in this one. Bush, like all high level politicians, was groomed for many years to be a public face/servant for the real world controllers. He was a long time lackey for Kissinger, he was the American ambassador to China when Rockefeller/Kissinger got the ball rolling to turn China into the capitalist slave pla Unlike other books about the Bush crime family I have read, even those that had an obvious anti-Bush bias going in, Tarpley leaves no stone uncovered in digging into the life of Poppy Bush in this one. Bush, like all high level politicians, was groomed for many years to be a public face/servant for the real world controllers. He was a long time lackey for Kissinger, he was the American ambassador to China when Rockefeller/Kissinger got the ball rolling to turn China into the capitalist slave plantation that it is now, he was head of the CIA for a few years before becoming vice President. Just these facts alone should be enough to know the guy is a creep but this is only the tip of the iceberg. Overall this is probably the best book about the Bush Crime family, and you get plenty of bang for your buck if you were to buy this, its freaking HUGE. The biggest fault it has is it pushes the idea of the Bush family being some sort of eugenics practicing Nazis. This book is written by Larouchites, who get out a lot of great information and have published some great stuff (Dope Inc.) but Larouche and his associates also play the politically correct card and mix in disinfo with the good information in my opinion. Look at least the Nazis, as big of an albatross and curse to the white people as they have become, at least had pretensions to bettering the white race. If you can show me one instance of anything pro-white any Bush has EVER done I'd like to see it. They are nothing but high level servants to the uber capitalists/globalists that really run the world. Prescott Bush was nothing but a lackey when he worked for the Harrimans. I can't imagine that he was allowed to make decisons where the Harrimans where going to put their money without being told first and if the Harrimans sunk a lot of money into Germany during Hitlers reign it wasn't because they wanted to Eugenicly improve the world, it was because they are sociopaths who would kill their own Mother if they thought it would make them a buck.

  2. 4 out of 5

    Paul Bustion

    I did not like this book for the most part. There were, here and there, despite the authors' best efforts, a few nuggets of useful information, but for the most part the book was garbage. It focused on discredited conspiracy theories such as George Bush being involved in the JFK assassination. It also made up new, even more bizarre ones, such as claiming Bush was involved in a prostitution ring, or that he was a Nazi sympathizer. But even while accusation Bush and his father Prescott of being Na I did not like this book for the most part. There were, here and there, despite the authors' best efforts, a few nuggets of useful information, but for the most part the book was garbage. It focused on discredited conspiracy theories such as George Bush being involved in the JFK assassination. It also made up new, even more bizarre ones, such as claiming Bush was involved in a prostitution ring, or that he was a Nazi sympathizer. But even while accusation Bush and his father Prescott of being Nazi sympathizers, they also attack the Bush family for their Freemasonry. The Nazis opposed Freemasonry because they viewed it as a tool of world Jewry, so I do not see how Tarpley and Chaitkin can accuse the Bush family of both Nazism and Freemasonry. The authors are obviously Christian Democrats who are either Catholic or very pro-Catholic, because they are very right-wing politically, and opposed to family planning, while also favoring New Deal type social programs, and attacking Freemasonry for it's alleged anti-Catholicism. The authors did get some facts right. Bush's family was brought to power through connections with other families such as the Harrimans, as the authors correctly document. The Bushes were members of a secret fraternity at Yale called Skull and Bones, the authors said some accurate things about this. When George Bush ran for the USA Senate against Democrat Ralph Yarborough he joined the John Birch Society, ran as a supporter of far right candidate for President Barry Goldwater, and opposed civil rights and called on USA withdrawal from the UN if the People's Republic of China were admitted. Then Bush broke that promise when he was Ambassador to China. The authors document how George Bush ran against Nelson Rockefeller for Vice President under Gerald Ford in 1974, and both represented New England financial interests, although Bush also had the support of the far right, for example Goldwater. Bush represented the Brown Brothers Harriman network, Rockefeller represented the Standard Oil network. Bush lost, but was consoled with the job of Ambassador to China. In China Bush coddled the oppressive regime there. This actually makes sense to me, but I don't agree with Tarpley's reasoning. He sees Bush as pro-communist, whereas I see him as pro$. He just wanted the Maoist regime's money, that was all. Later on, despite the fact that Bush had run against Rockefeller for Vice President, Rockefeller's brother David Rockefeller, along with other New England Republicans, supported George Bush for the Republican presidential nomination in 1980, but the far right under Ronald Reagan defeated Bush. These are about the only useful facts I got from the book. The rest was garbage conspiracy theories. There are many, much better biographies of Bush. So I would not recommend this book except for the most interested reader.

  3. 4 out of 5

    Jeff Wasel

  4. 5 out of 5

    Donna Hartquist

  5. 4 out of 5

    Justin Tucker

  6. 5 out of 5

    Reggie La Boe

  7. 5 out of 5

    Jason Perz

  8. 5 out of 5

    Steven S.

  9. 4 out of 5

    Andrew

  10. 4 out of 5

    John Michael

  11. 4 out of 5

    W

  12. 4 out of 5

    Dd Taylor

  13. 5 out of 5

    Chiramba Matanda

  14. 4 out of 5

    Josh Disney

  15. 5 out of 5

    Chris

  16. 4 out of 5

    Frank Fiorello

  17. 5 out of 5

    Carrie Gorman

  18. 4 out of 5

    Ronald L. Banks

  19. 5 out of 5

    Shirley Aldana

  20. 4 out of 5

    Manheim Wagner

  21. 4 out of 5

    Kathryn

  22. 4 out of 5

    Fred Salter

  23. 5 out of 5

    Austin

  24. 4 out of 5

    Amiri Barksdale

  25. 4 out of 5

    Donald

  26. 4 out of 5

    Kiragu

  27. 4 out of 5

    Vettius29

  28. 4 out of 5

    Charles Wooster

  29. 5 out of 5

    YNOT

  30. 5 out of 5

    Ahem!

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.