counter create hit The United States Constitution: Two Hundred Years of Anti-Federalist, Abolitionist, Feminist, Muckraking, Progressive, and Especially Socialist Criticism - Download Free eBook
Ads Banner
Hot Best Seller

The United States Constitution: Two Hundred Years of Anti-Federalist, Abolitionist, Feminist, Muckraking, Progressive, and Especially Socialist Criticism

Availability: Ready to download

"How can anyone claim to really understand our Constitution without knowing what these critical traditions had to say?" --Michael Wallace, Professor of History, John Jay College. "A real contribution to the subject of democracy and liberalism." --John Ehrenberg. "Does a marvelous job of returning the Constitution to its proper sphere, the product of the rough and tumble of "How can anyone claim to really understand our Constitution without knowing what these critical traditions had to say?" --Michael Wallace, Professor of History, John Jay College. "A real contribution to the subject of democracy and liberalism." --John Ehrenberg. "Does a marvelous job of returning the Constitution to its proper sphere, the product of the rough and tumble of politics." -- Malcom M. Feely, author of "Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State." ""The United States Constitution" is a provocative book, much needed for overdue rethinking on the Constitution proper and its amendments. By making available "the underside of criticism and protest that has accompanied the Constitution from its inception" the book cuts through a mountainous mass of conventional bombast, one-sided versions and outright fabrications regarding the Constitution. In clarifying what makes the Constitution's clock tick, the book lives up to its subtitle. --Ira Gollobin, National Emergency Civil Rights Committee NEVER BEFORE ASSEMBLED IN A SINGLE VOLUME--the major writings on the Constitution from six critical traditions. Here is THE OTHER SIDE in most of the key disputes over the Constitution from 1789 to the present, the side that was barely heard during the recent Bicentennial celebrations. Yet, it was often the popular side, raising many troublesome questions about the nature of American democracy that still remain to be answered. Now that the applause has subsided, every fair- minded person will want to know what these critics of the Constitution have to say about who did, and is still doing, what to whom, and why. Section 1 outlines the main events and problems that led up to and contributed to the calling of the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Section 2 concentrates on what actually happened at the convention. Section 3 deals with the two-hundred-year history of interpretations and amendments that followed. Section 4 offers a number of ideas that should prove helpful in constructing the adequate theory of the Constitution that still eludes us. Skillfully woven into one volume the forty contributors include voices as varied as those of Gore Vidal, I.F. Stone, Ralph Nader, E.P. Thompson, Howard Zinn, Sheldon S. Wolin, Joan Hoff, Karl Marx, Jackson Turner Main, Charles A. Beard, and W.E.B. Du Bois joined--perhaps surprisingly--by Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Thurgood Marshall.


Compare
Ads Banner

"How can anyone claim to really understand our Constitution without knowing what these critical traditions had to say?" --Michael Wallace, Professor of History, John Jay College. "A real contribution to the subject of democracy and liberalism." --John Ehrenberg. "Does a marvelous job of returning the Constitution to its proper sphere, the product of the rough and tumble of "How can anyone claim to really understand our Constitution without knowing what these critical traditions had to say?" --Michael Wallace, Professor of History, John Jay College. "A real contribution to the subject of democracy and liberalism." --John Ehrenberg. "Does a marvelous job of returning the Constitution to its proper sphere, the product of the rough and tumble of politics." -- Malcom M. Feely, author of "Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State." ""The United States Constitution" is a provocative book, much needed for overdue rethinking on the Constitution proper and its amendments. By making available "the underside of criticism and protest that has accompanied the Constitution from its inception" the book cuts through a mountainous mass of conventional bombast, one-sided versions and outright fabrications regarding the Constitution. In clarifying what makes the Constitution's clock tick, the book lives up to its subtitle. --Ira Gollobin, National Emergency Civil Rights Committee NEVER BEFORE ASSEMBLED IN A SINGLE VOLUME--the major writings on the Constitution from six critical traditions. Here is THE OTHER SIDE in most of the key disputes over the Constitution from 1789 to the present, the side that was barely heard during the recent Bicentennial celebrations. Yet, it was often the popular side, raising many troublesome questions about the nature of American democracy that still remain to be answered. Now that the applause has subsided, every fair- minded person will want to know what these critics of the Constitution have to say about who did, and is still doing, what to whom, and why. Section 1 outlines the main events and problems that led up to and contributed to the calling of the Constitutional Convention in 1787. Section 2 concentrates on what actually happened at the convention. Section 3 deals with the two-hundred-year history of interpretations and amendments that followed. Section 4 offers a number of ideas that should prove helpful in constructing the adequate theory of the Constitution that still eludes us. Skillfully woven into one volume the forty contributors include voices as varied as those of Gore Vidal, I.F. Stone, Ralph Nader, E.P. Thompson, Howard Zinn, Sheldon S. Wolin, Joan Hoff, Karl Marx, Jackson Turner Main, Charles A. Beard, and W.E.B. Du Bois joined--perhaps surprisingly--by Woodrow Wilson, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and Thurgood Marshall.

28 review for The United States Constitution: Two Hundred Years of Anti-Federalist, Abolitionist, Feminist, Muckraking, Progressive, and Especially Socialist Criticism

  1. 4 out of 5

    ben

    I really liked the alternative selection of authors and the critique each offered on the Constitution.

  2. 5 out of 5

    Dante Petersen Stanley

  3. 4 out of 5

    Sam V

  4. 4 out of 5

    Melissia Smith

  5. 4 out of 5

    Anthony

  6. 5 out of 5

    Josh Gathany

  7. 4 out of 5

    June Vutrano

  8. 5 out of 5

    Lawrence A

  9. 4 out of 5

    Daniel

  10. 5 out of 5

    Gordon Bermant

  11. 4 out of 5

    Zainab

  12. 4 out of 5

    Josh

  13. 5 out of 5

  14. 5 out of 5

    BookDB

  15. 4 out of 5

    Hannah Scott

  16. 5 out of 5

    Will

  17. 5 out of 5

    Bill

  18. 4 out of 5

    Ana

  19. 5 out of 5

    Tim

  20. 5 out of 5

    Brianna Zani

  21. 5 out of 5

    J

  22. 5 out of 5

    Elivn

  23. 4 out of 5

    Cortney

  24. 5 out of 5

    Smokebath

  25. 4 out of 5

    Manu L

  26. 4 out of 5

    Aidan

  27. 4 out of 5

    Kenneth Anttila

  28. 5 out of 5

    Luke T

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.